tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7060730943841798035.post5294637892709287756..comments2023-11-05T00:24:05.456-07:00Comments on Sustainability eMagazine: Federal Appeals Court Ruling Puts Climate Change into Election DebateBizManhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04567436767604729270noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7060730943841798035.post-88553747430242257262012-06-27T10:24:34.615-07:002012-06-27T10:24:34.615-07:00The Auto industry actually liked this ruling. They...The Auto industry actually liked this ruling. They will now have a consistent standard to work with in the USA, not a different standard in each state (read California here).<br /><br />http://www.friendsoftheuschamber.com/article/epas-broad-authority-to-regulate-emissions-upheld-by-us-appeals-court<br /><br />Note the three areas that were dealt with:<br />"<br />"We conclude," the judges ruled, that "1) the Endangerment Finding and Tailpipe Rule are neither arbitrary nor capricious; 2) EPA’s interpretation of the governing [Clean Air Act] provisions is unambiguously correct; and 3) no petitioner has standing to challenge the Timing and Tailoring Rules."<br />In their ruling, the three judges also concluded that EPA's initial endangerment finding was "consistent" with the high court's 2007 decision. It was enough to buoy the EPA's long-embattled administrator.<br />"BizManhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04567436767604729270noreply@blogger.com